Advertisment ACS-IndiaSymposium
 
Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results
  Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Search Article 
  
Advanced search 
 Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts  
 


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 51-54  

Absence of central activity in Wrightia tinctoria bark ethanolic extract


1 Radharaman Group of Institutes, Radharaman College of Pharmacy, Fatahpur Dopra, Ratibad, Bhopal, MP, India
2 Rayat College of Pharmacy, Rail Majra, near Ropar Nawanshahr, Punjab, India

Date of Web Publication15-Jan-2011

Correspondence Address:
P Bigoniya
Principal, Radharaman College of Pharmacy, Radharaman Group of Institutes, Bhadbada Road, Ratibad, Bhopal, MP
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0976-9234.75705

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Objective: The objective of the present study was to investigate the central activity profile of Wrightia tinctoria (Roxb) R.Br. Linn. (Family: Apocynaceae) in mice and rats using various models. Materials and Methods: The effects of ethanolic extract were observed in 3 different dose levels 300, 500, and 1000 mg/kg as the extract did not show any signs of toxicity up to 5000 mg/kg (p.o.) dose. Investigations were carried out for assessing the activity on pentobarbitone-induced hypnosis and maximum electro-shock (MES)- and leptazole-induced convulsions. Results: W. tinctoria ethanolic extract did not have any significant effect on pentobarbitone-induced hypnosis. The extract is devoid of any protective effect against leptazole- or MES-induced convulsions at any of the tested doses. Conclusion: W. tinctoria bark ethanolic extract had no central nervous system depressant or anticonvulsant activity.

Keywords: Antiepileptic, sedative, Wrightia tinctoria, laptazole


How to cite this article:
Bigoniya P, Rana A C. Absence of central activity in Wrightia tinctoria bark ethanolic extract. J Pharm Negative Results 2010;1:51-4

How to cite this URL:
Bigoniya P, Rana A C. Absence of central activity in Wrightia tinctoria bark ethanolic extract. J Pharm Negative Results [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Sep 22];1:51-4. Available from: http://www.pnrjournal.com/text.asp?2010/1/2/51/75705


   Introduction Top


Wrightia tinctoria (Roxb.) R.Br. Linn. is a small deciduous tree belonging to the family Apocynaceae, distributed in Central India, Burma, and Timor. This plant is extensively used in the Indian system of medicine. Fresh leaves are pungent and are chewed for relief from toothache. [1] Bark and seeds are antidysenteric, carminative, astringent, aphrodisiac, and diuretic, and are used in flatulence, stomach pain, and bilious affections. Oil emulsion of W. tinctoria pods is used to treat psoriasis and they also have fungicidal activity against Pityrosporum ovale, which was recovered from dandruff. [2] Ethyl acetate, acetone, and methanol extracts of W. tinctoria bark showed antinociceptive activity in mice. [3] W. tinctoria bark ethanolic extract showed immunomodulatory and good antiulcer activity against experimentally induced acute gastric ulcers on rat along with moderate analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity. [4],[5] Qualitative phytochemical investigation of crude plant extract revealed the presence of steroidal saponin, alkaloid, reducing sugar, tannins, and flavonoids.

A new sterol 14α-methylzymosterol in addition to 4 rare plant sterols, desmosterol, clerosterol, 24-methylene-25-methylcholesterol, and 24-dehydropollinastanol, have been isolated from W. tinctoria seeds. [6] The stem bark of W. tinctoria0 contains β-amyrin, lupeol, β-sitosterol, and a new triterpenoid.[7] In north and central India W. tinctoria is widely used to treat a number of ailments in traditional system of medicine; however, scientific data regarding its central effects are not available. Presence of steroid and triterpenoid in its ethanolic extract has provoked us to explore the possibilities of the central effects of W. tinctoria.


   Materials and Methods Top


Collection and identification of plant material

W. tinctoria bark was collected from Hoshangabad district of Madhya Pradesh, India, during Sept-Nov 2003. The plants were identified with the help of the available literature and authenticated by Dr. A.P. Shrivastava, Principal, P.K.S. Govt. Ayurveda College and Institute, Bhopal, India. A voucher specimen was deposited in the herbarium department (W. tinctoria; No. 1084).

Preparation of ethanolic extract

Ethanolic (70%) extract of dried, milled coarse bark powder was prepared by cold maceration. The extract was filtered through muslin cloth and evaporated at 40°C up to one third of the initial volume, and the remaining solvent was completely evaporated using a rotary vacuum evaporator (Superfit, Mumbai, India). The extract was then weighed and percentage yield calculated. The color and consistency of the extract was noted and subjected to different tests to detect the presence of various phytoconstituents. [8]

Drugs

The drugs used in the study were obtained from the following sources: diazepam (Ranbaxy, Dewas, MP, India), pentobarbitone sodium (Sigma, St. Louis, USA), phenytoin (Parke Davis India Ltd, Mumbai, India), and phenobarbitone sodium (CDH, New Delhi, India). All the standard drugs were dissolved in water for injection and administered intraperitoneally (i.p.).

Experimental animals

Swiss albino mice (weighing 18-25 g) and Wister albino rats (weighing 150-200 g) of either sex bred in Animal House facility at the Department of Pharmacology, Radharaman College of Pharmacy, Bhopal, were used. The animals were housed under standard laboratory conditions and maintained at 24°C ± 1°C, relative humidity 50% ± 15%, and under 12:12 h light:dark cycle. Commercial pellet diet (Hindustan Lever, Delhi, India) and water were provided ad libitum. All the experiments were performed between 0900 and 1700 hours. Ethical Committee approval was obtained before carrying out these experiments on rats and mice.

Dried crude extract was freshly suspended in 2% (w/v) carboxy methyl cellulose prepared in distilled water and used as vehicle control. On the basis of the OECD guidelines, a Limit test was performed to categorize the toxicity class (LD 50 ) of the compound. [9] Limit test was performed at 2000 mg/kg, per oral (p.o.) and repeated at 5000 mg/kg in which it did not show mortality in rats. LD 50 is greater than 5000 mg/kg. A dose range of 300, 500, and 1000 mg/kg were selected for evaluation of the pharmacologic activity. For all the studies, overnight fasted animals of either sex were divided randomly into 6 per group.

Effect on pentobarbitone-induced hypnosis in mice

Pentobarbitone (45 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered to the control and extract-treated animals after 30 min. Onset of sleep (loss of righting reflux) was noted and duration of sleep measured, which is the period between loss of righting reflux and its revival. [10] Diazepam (2 mg/kg, i.p) and the extract at different doses were given subsequently 30 and 45 min prior to pentobarbitone injection.

Effect on leptazole-induced convulsions in rats

All the animals were injected subcutaneously with 80 mg/kg of leptazole in the loose skin over the back, 1 h after the administration of the extracts and the standard drug diazepam (2 mg/kg, i.p.). The animals were observed for a further 1 h and the presence or absence of convulsions was recorded. The occurrence of facial or forelimb clonuses for more than 5 s was taken as the convulsion threshold. [11]

Effect on maximum electro-shock convulsions in rats

The test extracts, phenobarbitone sodium (45 mg/kg, i.p.) and phenytoin (120 mg/kg, i.p.), were given to the respective groups of animals 1 h before electro-shock and the time taken for each phase was observed. Antiepileptic activity on rats was measured using electro-convulsiometer (Techno, Haryana, India). A current of 150 mA strength was delivered to the animals using corneal electrodes for 0.2 s. The animals were placed on a table and its head was fixed. The eyes were made wet with normal saline solution and corneal electrodes were placed gently on the cornea. The shock was delivered by putting on the switch of the instrument and the animals were observed for the following: flexor component of tonic phase (extreme tonic flexion at limb joints with slight superimposed tremor), extensor component of tonic phase (extreme extension at all limb joints), intermittent jerky movements (clonic phase), and stupor phase. Time for each phase was noted using a stopwatch. [12]

Statistical analysis

Experimental data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. GraphPad Prism Version 3.02 software (San Diego, CA, USA) was used for statistical calculations.


   Results and Discussion Top


Qualitative phytochemical investigation of crude plant extract (dark brown in color, yield 19.145% w/w) revealed the presence of steroidal saponin, alkaloid, reducing sugar, tannins, flavonoids, and absence of glycoside. W. tinctoria bark extract at a dose range of 300, 500, and 1000 mg/kg orally, had no effect on the general behavior of rats. All the activities of the test animals were normal.

The study of unstrained behavioral pattern of animals is one of the preliminary screening methods to investigate the effects of a new drug on the central nervous system (CNS). Depending on the effect produced by the drug, conclusion can be easily drawn about the nature of the drug. These observations help to plan other experiments to confirm the pharmacologic aspect of the drug. The fact that many neurosedative drugs tend to decrease sleep latency and increase sleeping time led us to assay the effect of the extract on pentobarbitone-induced hypnosis. The extract did not have any significant effect on pentobarbitone-induced hypnosis at any tested dose level. The standard drug diazepam extreme significantly potentiated pentobarbitone-induced hypnosis (P < 0.001) but has insignificant effect on the onset of sleep [Table 1].
Table 1 :Effect of Wrightia tinctoria ethanolic extract on pentobarbitone sodium-induced hypnosis on rats

Click here to view


W. tinctoria does not have protective effect against leptazole-induced convulsion at any tested doses [Table 2]. W. tinctoria extract was shown to be devoid of anticonvulsant activity against maximum electro-shock convulsions at any tested dose levels [Table 3]. Interpretation of the study data showed negative implications of W. tinctoria's central effect. Pentobarbitone-induced hypnosis is used as a preliminary screening method to establish CNS activity pattern of a substance under study, categorizing it as a stimulant or a depressant. This study was a preliminary trial to establish unexplored CNS effects of W. tinctoria, although other exploratory trials can also be performed for confirmation. In the traditional system of medicine, W. tinctoria is used for treating a number of ailments but not related to CNS, signifying a lack of central activity in this plant. The results of this study are also in accordance with the traditional belief. The present finding will be helpful for the future researcher discouraging repetitive study on CNS activity profile of W. tinctoria. Change in phytochemical profiling of W. tinctoria using nonpolar solvent system or different extraction method can be explored for central activity.
Table 2 :Effect of Wrightia tinctoria ethanolic extract on leptazole-induced convulsion on rats

Click here to view
Table 3 :Effect of Wrightia tinctoria ethanolic extract on MES-induced convulsion on rats

Click here to view



   Conclusion Top


W. tinctoria bark extract when administered orally, up to a dose of 1000 mg/kg in albino rats, showed no sign of CNS depression or stimulation. W. tinctoria bark ethanolic extract did not have any effect on pentobarbitone-induced sleeping latency. Although several phytosterols have been isolated from W. tinctoria bark, the ethanolic extract had no anticonvulsant activity, which revealed that it is devoid of any CNS activity.


   Acknowledgment Top


The authors are thankful to the authorities of Radharaman College of Pharmacy, Bhopal, for providing necessary facilities to carry out the experiments.

 
   References Top

1.Kirtikar KR, Basu BD. Indian Medicinal Plants. Vol. 2. Delhi: Jayyed Press; 1975. p. 1581.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Krishnamoorthy JR, Ranganathan S. Antipityrosporum ovale activity of a herbal drug combination of Wrightia tinctoria and Hisbiscus rosasinensis. Indian J Dermatol 2000;45:125-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Reddy YSR, Venkatesh S, Ravichandran T, Murugan V, Suresh B. Antinociceptive activity of Wrightia tinctoria bark. Fitoterapia 2000;73:421-3.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Bigoniya P, Rana AC, Agrawal GP. Evaluation of the antiulcer activity of hydro-alcoholic extract of Wrightia tinctoria bark in experimentally induced acute gastric ulcers on rat. Nigerian J Nat Prod Med 2006;10:36-40.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Bigoniya P, Shukla A, Agrawal GP, Rana AC. 2008. Pharmacological screening of Wrightia tinctoria bark hydro-alcoholic extract. Asian J Exp Sci 2008;22:235-44.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Akihisa T, Ahmad I, Singh S, Tamura T, Matsumoto T. 14α-methylzymosterol and other sterols from Wrightia tinctoria seeds. Phytochemistry 1988;27:3231-4.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Rangaswami S, Nageswara RM. Crystalline chemical components of the bark of Wrightia tinctoria. Br Proc Ind Acad Sci 1963;57:115-20.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Kokate CK, Purohit AP, Gokhale SB. Text Book of Pharmacognosy. Carbohydrate and derived products, drugs containing glycosides, drugs containing tannins, lipids, proteins alkaloids. 7th ed. India: Nirali Prakashan; 2001. p. 133-66, 167-254, 255-69, 272-310, 428-523.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Diener W, Mischke U, Kayser D, Schlede E. The evaluation of the OECD modified version of acute toxicity class method (oral). Arc Toxicol 1995;69:729-34.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Harris JM, Spencer PSJ. A modified plythesmographic apparatus for recording volume changes in rat paw. J Pharm Pharmacol 1962;14:464-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Soaje-Echague E, Lim RK. 1962. Anticonvulsant activity of some carbinylureas. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1962;138:224-8.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Goyal RK. 2000. Practicals in pharmacology. Ahmedabad: BS. Shah Prakashan; 2000. p. 107.  Back to cited text no. 12
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results and Disc...
    Conclusion
    Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3637    
    Printed245    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded407    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal