Accuracy Of The One-Stage And Two-Stage Impression Techniques

Authors

  • Dr Sheetal Grover , Dr. HITESHI SHARMA , Dr Ankit Sharma , Dr Sarang Sharma , Dr Esha Bali , Dr. Drishti Palwankar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2023.14.02.170

Abstract

Background: To study accuracy of one- stage and two- stage impression techniques.

Materials & methods: A resin laboratory-made model with the first molar was prepared by standard method for full crowns with processed preparation finish line of 1 mm depth and convergence angle of 3-4°. Independent t- test was done. The result was analysed using SPSS software.

Results: The mean value of the marginal gap obtained by one-stage impression technique was higher than that of two-stage impression technique. A significant difference was reported between the two impression techniques in mid mesial, distal, and lingual regions and average of all surfaces (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: There is higher accuracy for two-stage impression technique than for the one-stage impression technique.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-01 — Updated on 2023-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Accuracy Of The One-Stage And Two-Stage Impression Techniques. (2023). Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 1335-1337. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2023.14.02.170