Prediction of Insufficient Accuracy for Mushroom Classification whether Poisonous or Eatable Food using K-Nearest Neighbour by comparing Naive Bayes Training to Improve Accuracy

Authors

  • Maheswara Reddy
  • Saravanan.M.S

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S04.058

Keywords:

Machine Learning, Data Mining, Novel K-Nearest Neighbour, Naive Bayes Training, Poisonous, Mushrooms.

Abstract

Aim: The main objective of the research study is to improve the good quality production for the better accuracy of eatable or poisonous mushrooms. It ought to be checked for consumable mushrooms. Exact assurance and appropriate distinguishing proof of species are the main safe approach to guarantee that the eatable mushrooms are poisonous, and defend against potential mishaps of burning through harmful one. Materials and Methods: The review utilized 51 samples with two groups of calculations with the G-power worth of 80% and the Mushroom were collected from different web sources with late review discoveries and edge 0.05%, certainty span 95% mean and standard deviation. To anticipate the Mushroom exactness rate for currently the Naive Bayes Training calculation has found 89.84% of precision, therefore this study needs to find better accuracy for accuracy decrease prediction with the Novel K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) algorithm, Machine Learning calculation. Results: This exploration concentrated on finding 86.04% of precision for noxious identification utilizing the KNN calculation with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.011; p<0.05) with 95% confidence interval. Conclusion: This review reasons that the KNN calculation on exactness is essentially better compared to the Naive Bayes Training calculation.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Prediction of Insufficient Accuracy for Mushroom Classification whether Poisonous or Eatable Food using K-Nearest Neighbour by comparing Naive Bayes Training to Improve Accuracy. (2022). Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 525-535. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S04.058